![]() ![]() It publishes high-quality clinical and basic medical research and other relevant manuscri pts that relate to all fields of Medical/clinical Microbiology and infectious diseases. Microbes and Infectious Diseases is open access, a quarterly, double-blinded peer-reviewed medical journal. Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery. SECTION TWELVE: SURGICAL SPECIALTIES: General Surgery. SECTION ELEVEN: POSTOPERATIVE PATIENT CARE: Postoperative Patient Care. SECTION TEN: SURGICAL SITE MANAGEMENT: Hemostasis and Wound Closure. Skin Preparation and Draping of the Surgical Site. SECTION NINE: INTRAOPERATIVE PATIENT CARE: Co-ordinated Roles of Scrub Person and Circulator. Physiologic Maintenance and Monitoring of the Perioperative Patient. SECTION EIGHT: ANESTHESIA CONSIDERATIONS: General Anaesthesia: Techniques and Agents. SECTION SEVEN: PREOPERATIVE PATIENT CARE: Preoperative Care of the Patient. SECTION SIX: INSTRUMENTATION AND EQUIPMENT: Surgical Instrumentation. Attire, Surgical Scrub, Gowning, and Gloving. Principles of Asepsis and Sterile Technique. SECTION FIVE: SURGICAL ASEPSIS: Microbiologic Considerations. SECTION FOURTHE PERIOPERATIVE ENVIRONMENT: Physical Facilities. SECTION THREE: THE PATIENT AS A UNIQUE INDIVIDUAL: The Patient: The Reason for Your Existence. Administration of Perioperative Patient Care Services. ![]() SECTION TWO: THE PERIOPERATIVE HEALTH CARE TEAM: The Perioperative Patient Care Team. Foundations of Perioperative Patient Care. SECTION ONE: CORRELATION OF THEORY AND PRACTICE. Discussion: The lack of knowledge and practices regarding basic infection control protocols should be improved by way of educational intervention, in the form of formal training of the doctors and nurses and reinforcement of the same. Only 57% of the doctors and nurses followed the maximal barrier precautions before a CVC insertion. The implementation of SPs was biased towards the HIV positive status of the patient. Results: The study group had suboptimal knowledge regarding the SPs (55.3%) and risks associated with NSI (31.8%). Knowledge and practices of 329 nurses and 71 doctors regarding hand hygiene, SPs, hospital environmental cleaning and needle stick injury were collected and analyzed. Materials and Methods: A structured questionnaire was distributed to the study group and collected the same day. ![]() A study to assess the knowledge and practice of 400 healthcare personnel regarding hospital infection control practices was performed. New trends and developments in surgical asepsis.īackground: Basic infection control measures in any healthcare setup can reduce the rates of healthcare-associated infections. Recommend the importance of continuing education among OR staff to keep them updated with the Suturing among 40% of patients and there was a correlation between contamination of scrubbing tapsĬonclusion: There was an improper surgical asepsis practices performed by OR surgical team, we Of OR floor and conditioning system in 55% of surgeries, there was a surgical site infection(SSI) after Sterile persons touch only sterile items atĥ5% of surgeries, 84.9% of them performed surgical scrubbing correctly. Scrubbing sinks at 60% and 75% of surgeries respectively. Results: only 55% of patients showered the day of surgery, there was no cleaning of light and Swabs obtained from surgical site and from OR surfaces for Methods: The researchers utilized a three data collection forms to collect the needed data about Background: Surgical asepsis practices should maintained by the surgical team to preventĬontamination of the open surgical wound.Īim: This study aimed to evaluate the surgical asepsis practices in the operating theatre of King ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |